Shock the Casbah
by ADAM GARFINKLE
Again I come late
to the gabfest, this time about the Hamas-IDF confrontation in and around Gaza.
So much has already been said, and it falls in the usual categories: the thinly
didactic, the fatuous, the banal, the shrewd and, especially, the emotional. The
usual irrational Jewcentric crap, of all four sorts, too, can be readily
identified: the anti-Semitic, the philo-Semitic, the chauvinist and the
self-hating. For those who have endured this conflict in its several
manifestations for a wilderness of forty years (or more), the whole thing—the
Jewcentric mutterings very much included—is still as heartbreaking as ever. It
is also something well worth ignoring for the sake of one’s sanity, which helps
explain why I am so late to the keyboard. I tried mightily to resist writing
this note; I failed.
So what is there
to say after all? I can think of three, possibly useful, things to discuss.
First, in this age
of instantaneous amnesia in the segmented American cyberswirl, where the
backstory to any telegenic foreign event has long since disappeared into the
historical ether, it’s useful to restate for the inexpert observer a little of
the relevant history. Not knowing the basics makes it seem like both sides of
the conflict are made up of a bunch of hateful and insane yet regrettably
determined extremists. As appealing as this description may be to those with no
dog in the fight and who have an appetite for violent entertainment, and as apt
as it may seem upon substituting the words “one side” for “both sides” to pro-Israel
or pro-Palestinian partisans, it is not really accurate. Knowing the history
shows why what’s going on is a tragedy rather than a simple, if protracted, act
of mutual madness. Both sides are adept at making highly rational tactical
calculations, but they find themselves trapped in a merciless strategic
framework that turns every temporary advantage into a pointless sacrifice of
blood and hope.
Second, it is
worth pointing out what is both new and true in essence about the current round
of fighting. This round of fighting both is and is not the same ‘ol same ‘ol.