What is being sacrificed to maintain the euro and the E.U./U.S. banking cartel? Everything of value: liberty, democracy and sovereignty.
by Charles Hugh Smith
Today we present the culmination of the previous
entries ( Global Crisis: the
Convergence of Marx, Orwell and Kafka and Are You Loving Your
Servitude Yet?): A brief commentary by longtime correspondent Harun
I. on Mario Draghi's market-moving statement: “Within our mandate, the ECB is
ready to do whatever it takes to preserve the euro. And believe me, it will be
enough.”
Nice, Mr. Draghi, but at what cost? And who will
ultimately bear this cost? It is already far beyond the measure of mere money;
democracy, truth and sovereignty have all been destroyed to prop up the central
bankers' Status Quo. We can presume Mr. Bernanke and the Federal Reserve are in
on the propaganda campaign, and so we need to examine the words and promises of
these two central bankers, as well as what they have not said.
Is talking about printing money as good as actually
printing money? It would seem so. Is promising to "do whatever it
takes" as good as actually doing whatever it takes? Once again, it seems
so; global markets leaped at the "news" that the financial Status Quo
was going to be "saved" yet again.
What
if it is beyond saving?
What
if the cost in treasure, blood, liberty, sovereignty and truth is not worth the
'saving" of a broken, unsustainable, corrupted, parasitic, predatory
system? Do we get to choose, or are we just passengers on the train as the
central bankers accelerate toward the chasm ahead?
Here is Harun's commentary:
Words have meaning and people should choose them carefully. Nigel Farage commented that what he saw in the faces of EU officials was "madness". We should not underestimate his assessment.
At some point these individuals have to be viewed as dangerous. If we peer beyond terms such as QE, printing money out of thin air, stimulate, etc, and understand their effect, they begin to appear not so benign.
What if central bank officials came out and said, "We are going to raise your taxes", or "we are going to reduce your purchasing power", or, down to its essential point, "we are going to take money out of your pocket"? We know that there would be an uproar.






.jpg)

















