By Theodore Dalrymple
The left, said Le Monde on 31
August, has always been ill at ease with law and order. This is not quite true:
the left is only ill at ease in what it calls bourgeois democracies. In
people's democracies it has felt no qualms at all about order, though perhaps
law is another thing.
Why this illness at ease? The
left claims a special vocation to defend the helpless and the underdog,
wherever he might be, and criminals are mainly drawn from the impoverished
(even if nowadays impoverishment is only relative). Their homes are what, only
forty years ago, would have been called broken homes - the statistically normal
pattern now, at least in their social class. They are poorly educated and their
economic prospects are grim. To heap punishment upon them for the 'natural'
consequences of their life experiences seems cruel and unfeeling.
However, this illness at ease
is not quite as generous as it might appear. In the first place, it ascribes to
the criminals themselves no choice in their own behaviour, as if they were 'you
blocks, you stones, you worse than senseless things.‘ In the second place, it
makes a certain kind of person - all those with similar experiences - criminal
ex officio, as it were. This is demeaning to the many who are not criminal.