CONFIRMATION as to how seriously some
companies are taking additive manufacturing, popularly known as 3D printing,
came on November 20th when GE Aviation, part of the world’s biggest
manufacturing group, bought a privately owned company called Morris Technologies.
This is a small precision-engineering firm employing 130 people in suburban
Cincinnati, Ohio. Morris Technologies has invested heavily in 3D printing
equipment and will be printing bits for a new range of jet engines.Morris
Technologies uses a number of 3D printing machines, all of which work by using
a digital description of an object to build it in physical form, layer by
layer. Among the 3D printing technologies used by Morris Technologies is laser
sintering. This involves spreading a thin layer of metallic powder onto a build
platform and then fusing the material with a laser beam. The process is
repeated until an object emerges. Laser sintering is capable of producing all
kinds of metal parts, including components made from aerospace-grade titanium.
Wednesday, November 28, 2012
The US has imposed protective shoe tariffs on Americans for decades, even with no domestic shoe industry to protect
We should have more legislation with an “expiration date
Almost all (99%)
of the footwear Americans purchase is imported, so there is no longer a
domestic shoe industry that needs special-interest protectionist trade
legislation to compete more successfully with lower-cost foreign
competitors. And yet remarkably, Americans are still paying protective tariff tax rates
of between 37.5% and 67.5% on imported footwear as a legacy of the Smoot-Hawley
Tariff Act of 1930.
Blake Krueger,
chairman of the Footwear Distributors & Retailers Association, explains in yesterday’s
WSJ:
Smoot-Hawley legislation set high tariffs on hundreds of products. In the decades since 1930, many of these rates have been reduced to more reasonable levels, or eliminated altogether. However, footwear tariffs have remained largely untouched. The thriving U.S. shoe-manufacturing sector of the 1930s is long gone, but what remains are protective tariff rates of 37.5%, 48% and some as high as 67.5%.
The euro lives, but unity is dead
Europe is bound to become marginal in global affairs over the next decade as the world refocuses on the Pacific
Greece is
saved one more time and the euro sound. Yet it is the European Union that has fallen apart in
the most recent round of the crisis on the old continent.
The bet that the International Monetary Fund (IMF) made with the eurozone on Greek debt paid off. IMF chief economist Olivier Blanchard pledged an intervention by the Fund in support of Greece only as long as Europe took part. Initially, Europe wanted only the IMF to intervene, but the IMF replied that it would step in only if Europe was committed to rescuing Greece. In other words, Europe refused to save Greece on its own, and it wanted an extra-European intervention to solve Europe's most critical problem.
This was not because Europe lacked the funds or instruments to support Greece, but because it lacked the political will necessary to rescue the euro's weakest link. In other words, Europe refused to resort to political instruments to solve the European crisis. It wanted, rather, a purely economic solution that wouldn't bring the continent closer together politically.
The bet that the International Monetary Fund (IMF) made with the eurozone on Greek debt paid off. IMF chief economist Olivier Blanchard pledged an intervention by the Fund in support of Greece only as long as Europe took part. Initially, Europe wanted only the IMF to intervene, but the IMF replied that it would step in only if Europe was committed to rescuing Greece. In other words, Europe refused to save Greece on its own, and it wanted an extra-European intervention to solve Europe's most critical problem.
This was not because Europe lacked the funds or instruments to support Greece, but because it lacked the political will necessary to rescue the euro's weakest link. In other words, Europe refused to resort to political instruments to solve the European crisis. It wanted, rather, a purely economic solution that wouldn't bring the continent closer together politically.
Why $16 Trillion Only Hints at the True U.S. Debt
Hiding the government's
liabilities from the public makes it seem that we can tax our way out of
mounting deficits. We can't.
by CHRIS COX AND BILL ARCHER
A decade and a half ago, both
of us served on President Clinton's Bipartisan Commission on Entitlement and
Tax Reform, the forerunner to President Obama's recent National Commission on
Fiscal Responsibility and Reform. In 1994 we predicted that, unless something
was done to control runaway entitlement spending, Medicare and Social Security
would eventually go bankrupt or confront severe benefit cuts.
Eighteen years later, nothing
has been done. Why? The usual reason is that entitlement reform is the third rail
of American politics. That explanation presupposes voter demand for
entitlements at any cost, even if it means bankrupting the nation.
A better explanation is that
the full extent of the problem has remained hidden from policy makers and the
public because of less than transparent government financial statements. How
else could responsible officials claim that Medicare and Social Security have
the resources they need to fulfill their commitments for years to come?
As Washington wrestles with
the roughly $600 billion "fiscal cliff" and the 2013 budget, the far
greater fiscal challenge of the U.S. government's unfunded pension and
health-care liabilities remains offstage. The truly important figures would
appear on the federal balance sheet—if the government prepared an accurate one.
The Facts About Spending & Taxes
An
Overdue Book
By Thomas
Sowell
If
everyone in America had read Stephen Moore's new book, "Who's The Fairest
of Them All?", Barack Obama would have lost the election in a landslide.
The point here is not to say,
"Where was Stephen Moore when we needed him?" A more apt question
might be, "Where was the whole economics profession when we needed
them?" Where were the media? For that matter, where were the Republicans?
Since "Who's The Fairest
of Them All?" was published in October, there was little chance that it
would affect this year's election. But this little gem of a book exposes, in
plain language and with easily understood facts, the whole house of cards of
assumptions, fallacies and falsehoods which constitute the liberal vision of
the economy.
Tuesday, November 27, 2012
Egypt is rocking, a new Pharaoh rises
Morsi against the New Left
By M K Bhadrakumar
Catching the tumult of a revolution on camera is
virtually impossible — especially a revolution like the one Egypt which rolls
on with no end in view. Another revolution in revolution is unfolding. The
Chinese cameramen have caught some fantastic visuals as the banks of the Nile
begin to heave again with seamless human passions. The Xinhua photo album is here.
Egypt is rocking. The country is being torn
apart. The left has become the right. The Muslim Brotherhood, which championed
the underdog has become the Establishment. And a New Left has appeared,
comprising, paradoxically, the western style liberals and centrists,
secularists and leftists — in fact, all else except the Islamists.
When Work Is Punished
The Tragedy Of America's Welfare State
By Tyler Drusden
Exactly two years
ago, some of the more politically biased progressive media outlets (who are
quite adept at creating and taking down their own strawmen arguments, if not
quite as adept at using an abacus, let alone a calculator) took offense at our
article "In Entitlement
America, The Head Of A Household Of Four Making Minimum Wage Has More
Disposable Income Than A Family Making $60,000 A Year." In it we
merely explained what has become the painful reality in America: for
increasingly more it is now more lucrative - in the form of actual disposable
income - to sit, do nothing, and collect various welfare entitlements, than to
work. This is graphically, and very painfully confirmed, in the below chart
from Gary Alexander, Secretary of Public Welfare, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
(a state best known for its broke capital Harrisburg). As quantitied, and
explained by Alexander, "the single mom is better off earnings
gross income of $29,000 with $57,327 in net income & benefits than to earn
gross income of $69,000 with net income and benefits of $57,045."

Asian countries ask US to Go Home
Post-US world born in Phnom Penh
It is symptomatic of the national condition of
the United States that the worst humiliation ever suffered by it as a nation,
and by a US president personally, passed almost without comment last week. I
refer to the November 20 announcement at a summit meeting in Phnom Penh that 15
Asian nations, comprising half the world's population, would form a Regional
Comprehensive Economic Partnership excluding the United States.
President Barack Obama attended the summit to
sell a US-based Trans-Pacific Partnership excluding China. He didn't. The
American led-partnership became a party to which no-one came.
Instead, the Association of Southeast Asian
Nations, plus China, India, Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand, will
form a club and leave out the United States. As 3 billion Asians become
prosperous, interest fades in the prospective contribution of 300 million
Americans - especially when those Americans decline to take risks on new
technologies. America's great economic strength, namely its capacity to
innovate, exists mainly in memory four years after the 2008 economic crisis.
Greece Wins Easier Debt Terms as EU Hails Rescue Formula
Constructive Ambiguity
European finance
ministers eased the terms on emergency aid for Greece, declaring after
three years of false starts that Europe has found
the formula for nursing the debt-stricken country back to health.
In the latest bid
to keep the 17-nation euro intact, the ministers cut the rates on bailout
loans, suspended interest payments for a decade, gave Greece more time to repay
and engineered a Greek bond buyback. The country was also cleared to receive a
34.4 billion-euro ($44.7 billion) loan installment in December. Greek bonds
rose.
“This has been a
very difficult deal,” Luxembourg Prime Minister Jean-Claude Juncker told
reporters in Brussels after chairing a 13-hour meeting that ended early today.
“All initiatives decided upon today will bring Greece’s public debt clearly
back on a sustainable path.”
After 240 billion
euros in loan pledges and the biggest write down of privately held debt failed
to turn Greece around, the creditor governments led by Germany proclaimed
the latest fix just as they grappled with swelling financing needs in Cyprus
and a potential aid request by Spain, the fourth-largest euro economy.
‘New Day’
In Athens, Prime Minister
Antonis Samaras went on national television after midnight to celebrate a “new
day” for Europe’s most debt-ridden country. While the financing pact rewarded
the government’s budget cuts and steps to overhaul the economy, Greece will
have to deliver on its commitments to earn each payout.
The end of Japan as we know it
Japan is on its last stretch as a major global economy
By Chan Akya
A few weeks ago, my Asia Times Online colleague Spengler wrote a missive on the eve of the US elections entitled "Barack Obama and America's Decline" , which included a plaintive plea for voters to cast their ballots on issues over and above their narrow personal interests. Predictably, my cynical response to him was on the lines of "why would turkeys vote FOR Thanksgiving?"; this being a family publication I shall not delve on his response to that missive.
A few weeks ago, my Asia Times Online colleague Spengler wrote a missive on the eve of the US elections entitled "Barack Obama and America's Decline" , which included a plaintive plea for voters to cast their ballots on issues over and above their narrow personal interests. Predictably, my cynical response to him was on the lines of "why would turkeys vote FOR Thanksgiving?"; this being a family publication I shall not delve on his response to that missive.
As it turned out, the turkeys did vote against thanksgiving, and Obama is back
in the White House to give Keynesian policies another shot. Specifically, the
arguments that will be aired in the next few weeks and months will echo those
of Professor Paul Krugman, who has himself filched a lot of ideas from the work
of Professor Richard Koo and his book, the very modestly titled The
Holy Grail of Macroeconomics" which I have reviewed in this column
many moons ago. (See We are all Japanese
now)
The central thesis of the book is that Japan failed to enact appropriate monetary and fiscal easing to counter the collapse in leverage engendered in the household and corporate sectors after the collapse of the economy in the late eighties and early nineties. Since the late '90s though, Japan's government has run a series of deficits while the central bank has kept interest rates at below zero through the liberal use of quantitative easing measures.
In fits and starts, the strategy has allowed Japan to remain afloat; however as the most recent trade deficit numbers make clear last week (a horrifying collapse in exports) and the travails of electronics giants Sony and Panasonic (both downgraded to junk credit rating last week by the Fitch agency), the path is nowhere near smooth; and indeed results appear to run counter to the best intentions of both Koo and by extension, Krugman.
At many levels, I have a deep admiration for the Japanese people; their work ethic, aesthetic values and personal discipline all set them apart from the globalized mainstream. Equally, a lot of people have called the death of Japan already; somehow the old lady didn't notice those obituaries and has continued to plod on despite all the deprivations that two decades of economic recession bring. A cat with the proverbial nine lives, in some ways.
Economics though is an unforgiving taskmaster, and eventually extracts change from the most obdurate societies. There are in particular a few specific factors that argue that the cat's nine lives are indeed up this time around.
The central thesis of the book is that Japan failed to enact appropriate monetary and fiscal easing to counter the collapse in leverage engendered in the household and corporate sectors after the collapse of the economy in the late eighties and early nineties. Since the late '90s though, Japan's government has run a series of deficits while the central bank has kept interest rates at below zero through the liberal use of quantitative easing measures.
In fits and starts, the strategy has allowed Japan to remain afloat; however as the most recent trade deficit numbers make clear last week (a horrifying collapse in exports) and the travails of electronics giants Sony and Panasonic (both downgraded to junk credit rating last week by the Fitch agency), the path is nowhere near smooth; and indeed results appear to run counter to the best intentions of both Koo and by extension, Krugman.
At many levels, I have a deep admiration for the Japanese people; their work ethic, aesthetic values and personal discipline all set them apart from the globalized mainstream. Equally, a lot of people have called the death of Japan already; somehow the old lady didn't notice those obituaries and has continued to plod on despite all the deprivations that two decades of economic recession bring. A cat with the proverbial nine lives, in some ways.
Economics though is an unforgiving taskmaster, and eventually extracts change from the most obdurate societies. There are in particular a few specific factors that argue that the cat's nine lives are indeed up this time around.
Bernanke's Easy Money Death Spiral
On the Road to Zero Growth
It seems that
big sucking sound signaling a precipitous
drop off in the demand for money that I
have been warning about for a few weeks is starting to get some more attention.
This past Monday, the Wall Street Journal ran a front page story headlined Investment
Falls Off a Cliff: US Companies Cut Spending Plans Amid Fiscal
and Economic Uncertainty. According to the article:
Nationwide, business investment in equipment and software -- a measure of economic vitality in the corporate sector -- stalled in the third quarter for the first time since early 2009.
Corporate executives say they are slowing or delaying big projects to protect profits amid easing demand and rising uncertainty. Uncertainty around the US elections and federal budget policies also appear among the factors driving the investment pullback since midyear.
Companies fear that failure to resolve the fiscal cliff will tip the economy back into recession by sapping consumer spending, damaging investor confidence and eating into corporate profits.
Ben’s debt binge to detonate retirement funds
Bond bubble bust
There goes the nest egg.
There’s a record $16.3 trillion of
US debt and a good portion of that is sitting in baby boomers’ portfolios like
a ticking time bomb ready to explode, and most investors know little about it.
“It’s my worst nightmare,” says a
long-only bond fund manager. “There’s nothing I can do — the checks come in
[from clients] every day, and I have to invest it.”
With Ben Bernanke’s debt paper floating through the
market and the Fed chief vowing to keep rates low until 2015, some bond
managers are hoping to get out before the bubble bursts and Armageddon hits.
And rates would not have to go
through the roof to take out billions in principal for investors, most of whom
are in bonds because they are nearing retirement.
“If the 10-year [bond] goes up 100
basis points, that could mean more than $35 billion is lost,” says one bond
trader.
One hundred basis points is just a
1 percent increase, which would put the 10-year at about 2.6 percent. The
average rate of return over the last decade is roughly 4 percent, which, if we
return to that yield, could put principal losses close to $500 billion, says a
bond manager.
How Partisans Fool Themselves Into Believing Their Own Spin
Science shows that
we often allow our moral judgment to overshadow factual arguments
This month's
presidential election was between two fairly centrist candidates.
And yet political discourse between ordinary Republicans and Democrats is more
contentious and hostile than it's been
in decades. I bet you strongly agree with one of these statements:
- If you're a Democrat: The Obama campaign for
reelection was run largely based on telling the truth. The Romney campaign was laregely based on lies.
- If you're a Republican: All political campaigns
stretch the facts from time to time to make a point. Romney and Obama both did.
I'd like to
suggest that both these statements are false.
Let's first take
on the claim that the Obama reelection team did not lie. During the campaign
President Obama said, directly and through campaign advertising, that Romney opposed gay adoption, opposed abortion even
in cases of rape or incest, and that Romney's plan could take away
middle-class tax deductions. He claimed that during his first term we doubled our use of
renewable energy, doubled exports, and that 30 million
Americans are going to get health care next year because of Obamacare. And that's
before we even get to how the campaign twisted the facts around when Romney
left Bain Capital to make him look bad.
Is the Enemy Us?
Fat Studies For Thin Minds
In his new book,
Bruce Bawer has proposed an answer to vexing questions: Why has our culture
become degraded? Why have our politics become polarized? And why has our public
debate coarsened? Bawer locates the source of these misfortunes in the changes
that have taken place in American higher education over the last
generation—above all, the emergence of multicultural “identity studies.” The
academy, he observes, is “the font of the perfidious multicultural idea and the
setting in which it is implanted into the minds of American youth.”
In what must be
reckoned a martyrdom operation, Bawer has spent countless hours not only
reading the collective oeuvre of the leading luminaries in
Black, Women’s, Gender, Queer, Fat, and Chicano Studies, but also traveling
America to attend their conferences. At a gathering of the Cultural Studies
Association at the University of California, Berkeley, for instance, Bawer encounters
the young Michele, who’s “like, a grad student at UC Davis?” She’s “sort of
reviving a Gramschian-style Marxism,” involving the idea that global warming is
“sort of, like, a crisis, in the human relationship to nature?” Bawer claims
that his heart goes out to her. (His heart is bigger than mine.)
Texas Schools Teaching Boston Tea Party As Terrorist Act
Neither Liberty Nor Security
By CBS News
By CBS News
The most historical instance of
protesting against taxation without representation is now being taught in Texas
schools as a terrorist act.
As
recently as January of this year, the Texas Education Service Center Curriculum
Collaborative included a lesson plan that depicted the Boston Tea Party, an
event that helped ignite the American Revolution, as an act of terrorism. TheBlaze reports that in a lesson promoted on the TESCCC
site as recently as January, a world history/social studies class plan depicted
the Boston Tea Party as being anything but patriotic, causing many people to
become upset with the lack of transparency and review for lessons.
Your Perception Is Your Reality
Capital Formation and the
Fiscal Cliff
There’s a very interesting
article in The Atlantic this week, called “How
Partisans Fool Themselves Into Believing Their Own Spin.” While the author,
Alesh Houdek, engages in some spin of his own, he makes some very good points
that we should keep in mind not only as we look at the potential effects of a
tax increase but as we tackle new ideas and accompanying “facts” in general.
And he has pointed us to a very interesting study, or at least it’s interesting
for those of us who are fascinated by behavioral psychology and behavioral
economics:
We weigh facts and lines of reasoning far more strongly when they favor our
own side, and we minimize the importance and validity of the opposition's
arguments. That may be appropriate behavior in a formal debate, or when we're
trying to sway the opinion of a third party. But to the extent that we internalize
these tendencies, they injure our ability to think and see clearly. And if we
bring them into the sort of open and honest one-on-one political debates that
we'd like to think Americans have with each other, we strain our own
credibility and undermine the possibility of reaching an understanding.
A defense attorney presents the best case for his client's innocence in
court, but he's realistic with himself about what he believes the truth of the
matter is. Too often in political arguments we have drunk our own Kool-Aid.”
Monday, November 26, 2012
Stop the Madness
Washington is spending the
country into economic decline
Summer is almost ended, and
Americans are growing more and more skeptical about the coming fall--about our
lack of jobs, our bigger and more expensive government, the higher taxes that
will be coming soon, more expensive and less personal health care, and, most
important, our declining economy.
A look at specific trends
makes it seem very bad indeed. As Mortimer Zuckerman recently wrote in The
Wall Street Journal: "Now there are at least 14.5 million Americans still
searching for work: 1.4 million of them have been jobless for more than 99
weeks, 6.5 million have been jobless for over 27 weeks."
Pessimism is on the increase,
and people are losing confidence in the president. In health care, while 39% of
people believe Barack Obama's performance is up to expectations, 55% say that
he has fallen short. Regarding our economy it is 29% positive and 66% negative.
And the budget deficit? Only 25% of people think the government has done well
controlling the deficit, while 67% believe it is too big and will not be cut.
Privatizing Greece, Slowly but Not Surely
Greece demands philanthropy, not investment
THE government
inspectors set out from Athens for what they thought was a pristine patch of
coastline on the Ionian Sea. Their mission was to determine how much money that
sun-kissed shore, owned by the Greek government, might sell for under a
sweeping privatization program demanded by the nation’s restive creditors.
What the inspectors
found was 7,000 homes — none of which were supposed to be there. They had been
thrown up without ever having been recorded in a land registry.
“If the government
wanted to privatize here, they would have to bulldoze everything,” says Makis
Paraskevopoulos, the local mayor. “And that’s never going to happen.”
Athens agreed. It
scratched the town, Katakolo, off a list of potential properties to sell. But
as Greece redoubles
its efforts to raise billions to cut its debt and stoke its economy, the
situation in Katakolo illustrates the daunting hurdles ahead.
'Smart Austerity' and the Latvian Turnaround
Smart austerity is economic stimulus, but not of the "borrow and print money" sort
An economic policy that combines growth—setting correct incentives—and austerity—getting rid of wrong and excessive spending—was key to our economic recovery
By DANIELS PAVLUTS
The recent trend-defying
economic growth in Latvia is good news for our country. It is not good news for
those who decry the Latvian government's policies of radical fiscal
consolidation and sweeping structural reforms as too focused on
"austerity" and not focused enough on "growth."
I think "smart
austerity" is a much more accurate description of our policy. Smart
austerity is economic stimulus, but not of the "borrow and print
money" sort. Smart austerity means reviving the business environment by
making it more competitive. It means creating a macroeconomic framework that
restores confidence and directs the economy away from debt-driven financial
services and construction. It also means safeguarding social stability and
protecting education spending from cuts, thereby preserving our long-term
competitiveness.
If deficit spending were stimulus, France would be king
Les
Moody Blues
Moody's stripped France of its
triple-A rating last week, citing "deteriorating economic prospects,"
the "long-standing rigidities of its labor, goods and services
markets" and "exposure to peripheral Europe." And it could get
worse: "We would downgrade the rating further in the event of an
additional material deterioration in France's economic prospects," says
Dietmar Hornung, Moody's lead analyst for France.
Don't think, however, that the
French government is unduly alarmed. Finance Minister Pierre Moscovici insisted
that the downgrade did not "call into question the economic fundamentals
of our country." We've never made a fetish of the opinions of the ratings
agencies, which tend to be lagging indicators. Nonetheless, the
"fundamentals" Mr. Moscovici points to are worth a closer look.
In 1981, when the Socialist
government of Francois Mitterrand took office, France's national debt amounted
to 22% of GDP. In the intervening years France's economy has grown by an
inflation-adjusted 73%, while the national debt—now at 90% of GDP—grew by 609%
in real terms. In raw numbers, that comes to about €1.7 trillion in additional
debt. At no time in those 31 years did any French government balance a budget,
much less run a surplus.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)




.jpg)










.jpg)



.jpg)