Potential employers have to respond to the incentives and disincentives that exist in today's world, and those do not favor conventional permanent employees.
by
Charles Hugh-Smith
I know you're hard-working,
motivated, tech-savvy and willing to learn. The reason I can't hire you has
nothing to do with your work ethic or skills; it's the high-cost Status Quo, and the many perverse
consequences of maintaining a failing Status Quo.
The sad truth is that it's
costly and risky to hire anyone to do anything, and "bankable
projects" that might generate profit/require more labor are few and far
between. The overhead costs for employees have skyrocketed. So even though the
wages employees see on their paychecks have stagnated, the total compensation
costs the employer pays have risen substantially.
Thirty years ago the overhead
costs were considerably less, adjusted for inflation, and there weren't
billboards advertising a free trip to Cabo if you sued your employer. (I just
saw an advert placed by a legal firm while riding a BART train that solicited
employees to sue their employers, with the incentive being "free
money" for a vacation to Cabo.)