From Gaddafi to Benghazi
Last week, four American diplomats were killed when
armed men attacked the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya. The attackers'
apparent motivation was that someone, apparently American but with an uncertain
identity, posted a video on YouTube several months ago that deliberately
defamed the Prophet Mohammed. The attack in Benghazi was portrayed as
retribution for the defamation, with the attackers holding all Americans
equally guilty for the video, though it was likely a pretext for deeper
grievances. The riots spread to other countries, including Egypt, Tunisia and
Yemen, although no American casualties were reported in the other riots. The
unrest appears to have subsided over the weekend.
Benghazi and the Fall of Gaddafi
In beginning to make sense of these attacks, one must
observe that they took place in Benghazi, the city that had been most opposed
to Moammar Gaddafi. Indeed, Gaddafi had promised to slaughter his opponents in
Benghazi, and it was that threat that triggered the NATO intervention in Libya.
Many conspiracy theories have been devised to explain the intervention, but,
like Haiti and Kosovo before it, none of the theories holds up. The
intervention occurred because it was believed that Gadhafi would carry out his
threats in Benghazi and because it was assumed that he would quickly capitulate
in the face of NATO air power, opening the door to democracy.
That Gaddafi was capable of mass murder was certainly
correct. The idea that Gaddafi would quickly fall proved incorrect. That a
democracy would emerge as a result of the intervention proved the most dubious
assumption of them all. What emerged in Libya is what you would expect when a
foreign power overthrows an existing government, however thuggish, and does not
impose its own imperial state: ongoing instability and chaos.