Murray Rothbard & Ayn Rand
By Tibor R. Machan
No one should attempt to treat Ayn
Rand and Murray N. Rothbard as uncomplicated and rather similar defenders of
the free society although they have more in common than many believe. As just
one example, neither was a hawk when it comes to deploying military power
abroad. There is evidence, too, that both considered it imprudent for the US
government to be entangled in international affairs, such as fighting dictators
who were no threat to America. Even their lack of enthusiasm for entering WW II
could be seen as quite similar.

And so far as their underlying
philosophical positions are concerned, they both can be regarded as
Aristotelians. In matters of economics they were unwavering supporters of the
fully free market capitalist system, although while Rand didn’t find
corporations per se objectionable, arguably Rothbard had some problems with
corporate commerce, especially as it manifest itself in the 20th century. One
sphere in which they took very different positions, at least at first glance,
is whether government is a bona fide feature of a genuinely free country. Rand
thought it is, Rothbard thought it wasn’t. Yet the reason Rothbard opposed
government was that it depended on taxation, something Rand also opposed, so
even here where the difference between them appears to be quite stark, they
were closer than one might think.
When intellectuals such as Rand and
Rothbard have roughly the same political-economic position, it isn’t that
surprising that they and their followers would stress the difference between
them instead of the similarities. Moreover, in this case both had a similar
explosive personality, with powerful likes and dislikes not just in
fundamentals but also in what may legitimately be considered incidentals–music,
poetry, novels, movies and so forth.